ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: There is disagreement between data on sleep duration obtained from questionnaires and objective measurements. Whether this is also true for individuals with CKD is unknown. Here we compared self-reported sleep duration with sleep duration obtained by actigraphy. Methods: This prospective study included adult individuals with stage 3 CKD recruited between September/2016 and February/2019. We evaluated subjective sleep duration by asking the following question: "How many hours of actual sleep did you get at night?" Results: Patients (N=34) were relatively young (51 ± 13 years). Self-reported and measured sleep duration were 7.1 ± 1.7 and 6.9 ± 1.6 hours, respectively, with no correlation between them (p=0.165). Although the mean difference between measurements was 0.21 h, the limits of agreement ranged from -3.7 to 4.1 h. Conclusion: Patients with CKD who are not on dialysis have an erroneous sleep perception. Data on sleep duration should be preferentially obtained from objective measurements in patients with CKD.
Resumo Introdução: Há discordância entre os dados sobre duração do sono obtidos a partir de questionários e medições objetivas. Não se sabe se isto também é verdade para indivíduos com DRC. Aqui comparamos a duração do sono autorrelatada com a duração do sono obtida por meio de actigrafia. Métodos: Este estudo prospectivo incluiu indivíduos adultos com DRC estadio 3 recrutados entre Setembro/2016 e Fevereiro/2019. Avaliamos a duração subjetiva do sono, fazendo a seguinte questão: "Quantas horas de sono real você teve à noite?" Resultados: Os pacientes (N=34) eram relativamente jovens (51 ± 13 anos). A duração do sono autorrelatada e mensurada foi de 7,1 ± 1,7 e 6,9 ± 1,6 horas, respectivamente, sem correlação entre elas (p=0,165). Embora a diferença média entre as medições tenha sido de 0,21 h, os limites de concordância variaram de -3,7 a 4,1 h. Conclusão: Pacientes com DRC que não estão em diálise apresentam uma percepção equivocada do sono. Dados sobre a duração do sono devem ser obtidos preferencialmente a partir de medições objetivas em pacientes com DRC.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Patients on hemodialysis are exposed to calcium via the dialysate at least three times a week. Changes in serum calcium vary according to calcium mass transfer during dialysis, which is dependent on the gradient between serum and dialysate calcium concentration (d[Ca]) and the skeleton turnover status that alters the ability of bone to incorporate calcium. Although underappreciated, the d[Ca] can potentially cause positive calcium balance that leads to systemic organ damage, including associations with mortality, myocardial dysfunction, hemodynamic tolerability, vascular calcification, and arrhythmias. The pathophysiology of these adverse effects includes serum calcium changes, parathyroid hormone suppression, and vascular calcification through indirect and direct effects. Some organs are more susceptible to alterations in calcium homeostasis. In this review, we discuss the existing data and potential mechanisms linking the d[Ca] to calcium balance with consequent dysfunction of the skeleton, myocardium, and arteries.
Resumo Pacientes em hemodiálise são expostos ao cálcio, por meio do dialisato, pelo menos três vezes por semana. As alterações no cálcio sérico variam de acordo com a transferência de massa de cálcio durante a diálise, que é dependente do gradiente entre a concentração de cálcio no plasma e no dialisato (d [Ca]) e o estado de renovação do esqueleto que altera a capacidade do osso de incorporar cálcio. Embora subestimado, o d [Ca] pode potencialmente causar balanço positivo de cálcio que leva a danos em órgãos sistêmicos, incluindo associações com mortalidade, disfunção miocárdica, tolerabilidade hemodinâmica, calcificação vascular e arritmias. A fisiopatologia desses efeitos adversos inclui alterações do cálcio sérico, supressão do hormônio da paratireóide e calcificação vascular por meio de efeitos diretos e indiretos. Alguns órgãos são mais suscetíveis a alterações na homeostase do cálcio. Nesta revisão, discutimos os dados existentes e os mecanismos potenciais que ligam o d [Ca] ao equilíbrio do cálcio com a consequente disfunção no esqueleto, miocárdio e artérias.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiovascular System , Calcium , Parathyroid Hormone , Bone and Bones , Renal DialysisABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: Body composition is critical for the evaluation of patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and can be obtained from either multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) or dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA). Although the discrepancy between the results obtained from both methods has already been described, reasons are unknown, and might be related to secondary hyperparathyroidism, which is associated with bone loss. Methods: We have evaluated 49 patients (25 males and 24 females): 20 with CKD not on dialysis and 29 on maintenance hemodialysis [18 with severe hyperparathyroidism (HD-SHPT) and 11 submitted to parathyroidectomy (HD-PTX)]. All patients underwent DXA and BIA. Results: The median age and body mass index (BMI) were 49 years and 25.6 kg/m2, respectively. Patients exhibited low bone mineral content (BMC) measured by DXA, particularly those from the HD-SHPT group. The largest BMC measurement disagreement between DXA and BIA was found in the HD-SHPT group (p=0.004). Factors independently associated with this discrepancy in BMC measurement were serum phosphate (p=0.003) and patient group (p=0.027), even after adjustments for age, BMI, and gender (adjusted r2=0.186). PTX attenuated this difference. Discussion: BIA should be interpreted with caution in patients with SHPT due to a loss of accuracy, which can compromise the interpretation of body composition.
Resumo Introdução: A composição corporal é fundamental para a avaliação de pacientes com Doença Renal Crônica (DRC), e pode ser obtida por análise de impedância bioelétrica por multifrequência (BIA) ou absorciometria de dupla energia (DXA). Embora a discrepância entre os resultados obtidos pelos dois métodos já tenha sido descrita, os motivos são desconhecidos e podem estar relacionados ao hiperparatireoidismo secundário, devido à perda óssea. Métodos: Avaliamos 49 pacientes (25 homens e 24 mulheres): 20 com DRC não em diálise e 29 em hemodiálise de manutenção [18 com hiperparatireoidismo grave (HD-SHPT) e 11 submetidos à paratireoidectomia (HD-PTX)]. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à DXA e BIA. Resultados: A mediana da idade e do índice de massa corporal (IMC) foram de 49 anos e 25,6 kg/m2, respectivamente. Os pacientes exibiram baixo conteúdo mineral ósseo (CMO) medido pelo DXA, particularmente aqueles do grupo HD-SHPT. A maior discordância da medida do CMO entre DXA e BIA foi encontrada no grupo HD-SHPT (p = 0,004). Os fatores independentemente associados a essa discrepância na medida do CMO foram fosfato sérico (p = 0,003) e grupo de pacientes (p = 0,027), mesmo após ajustes para idade, IMC e sexo (r2 ajustado = 0,186). PTX atenuou essa diferença. Discussão: A BIA deve ser interpretada com cautela em pacientes com HPTS devido a uma perda de precisão, o que pode comprometer a interpretação da composição corporal.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Bone Density , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary , Absorptiometry, Photon , Body Mass Index , Renal Dialysis , Electric ImpedanceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Depression is the most important neuropsychiatric complication in chronic kidney disease because it reduces quality of life and increases mortality. Evidence demonstrating the association between dialysis shift and depression is lacking; thus, obtaining such evidence was the main objective of this study. METHOD: This cross-sectional study included patients attending a hemodialysis program. Depression was diagnosed using Beck's Depression Inventory. Excessive daytime sleepiness was evaluated using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were enrolled (55 males, age 48±14 years). Depression and excessive daytime sleepiness were observed in 42.7% and 49% of the patients, respectively. When comparing variables among the three dialysis shifts, there were no differences in age, dialysis vintage, employment status, excessive daytime sleepiness, hemoglobin, phosphorus levels, or albumin levels. Patients in the morning shift were more likely to live in rural areas (p<0.0001), although patients in rural areas did not have a higher prevalence of depression (p = 0.30). Patients with depression were more likely to be dialyzed during the morning shift (p = 0.008). Independent risk factors for depression were age (p<0.03), lower levels of hemoglobin (p<0.01) and phosphorus (p<0.01), and dialysis during the morning shift (p = 0.0009). The hospitalization risk of depressive patients was 4.5 times higher than that of nondepressive patients (p<0.008). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that depression is associated with dialysis shift, higher levels of phosphorus, and lower levels of hemoglobin. The results highlight the need for randomized trials to determine whether this association occurs by chance or whether circadian rhythm disorders may play a role. .